Member-only story

Generational Tensions And Solidarity Within Advanced Welfare States Social: A Long-Term Comparative Analysis

Derek Bell

·5.1k Followers· Follow

Published in Generational Tensions And Solidarity Within Advanced Welfare States (Social Welfare Around The World)

4 min read

1.1k View Claps

79 Respond

Save

Listen

Generational tensions have become a major source of concern in many advanced welfare states. These tensions often arise when younger generations feel that they are being asked to bear the costs of an aging society, while older generations feel that they are being asked to give up their hard-earned benefits. As a result, there is a growing sense of intergenerational conflict in many countries.

Generational Tensions and Solidarity Within Advanced Welfare States (Social Welfare Around the World)

by Jacques Berlinerblau

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1763 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	226 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

However, it is important to note that generational tensions are not inevitable. In some countries, such as Sweden, there is a high level of generational solidarity. This solidarity is due in part to a strong sense of social cohesion, as well as to a well-developed system of social welfare. As a result, Sweden has been able to avoid many of the generational conflicts that have plagued other countries.

The Generational Solidarity Survey is a unique data set that allows us to track generational tensions and solidarity over time. The survey was conducted in 18 countries between 1985 and 2016, and it asked respondents about their attitudes towards other generations. The findings of the survey show that generational tensions have increased over time in most countries. However, the survey also shows that there is a great deal of solidarity between generations. In most countries, a majority of respondents said that they felt a sense of responsibility towards other generations.

The findings of the Generational Solidarity Survey have important implications for the future of social policy in advanced welfare states. First, the findings show that generational tensions are a real and growing problem. This means that policymakers need to take steps to address these tensions. Second, the findings show that there is a great deal of potential for generational solidarity. This means that policymakers should focus on building on this solidarity to create a more just and equitable society.

There are a number of different ways to address generational tensions. One important step is to ensure that all generations have access to affordable housing, healthcare, and education. This will help to reduce the sense of economic insecurity that can lead to generational conflict. Another important step is to promote intergenerational dialogue and understanding. This can be done through educational programs, community events, and the media.

Building on generational solidarity is also essential for the future of social policy. One important way to do this is to create social programs that benefit all generations. For example, investing in early childhood education can benefit both children and their parents. Another important way to build on generational solidarity is to promote civic engagement. This can be done by encouraging people to volunteer, vote, and participate in other forms of civic activity.

By addressing generational tensions and building on generational solidarity, advanced welfare states can create a more just and equitable society for all.

Generational tensions are a real and growing problem in many advanced welfare states. However, the findings of the Generational Solidarity Survey show that there is also a great deal of potential for generational solidarity. By addressing generational tensions and building on generational solidarity, advanced welfare states can create a more just and equitable society for all.

Generational Tensions and Solidarity Within Advanced Welfare States (Social Welfare Around the World)

by Jacques Berlinerblau

4.3 out of 5